Carlos LERENA (of Mendoza, m. Adela CAMIGLIA)

A SECOND CARLOS LERENA, AND THE REGISTER HAS SAID SO SINCE 14 SEPTEMBER WITHOUT GIVING HIM A ROW. He is named with ADELA CAMIGLIA as the parents of AVELINO CARLOS LERENA, baptised at San Nicolas de Tolentino, Mendoza, on 12 March 1904. HE IS NOT CARLOS AUGUSTO FEDERICO LERENA SALVANACH, the son of Gilberto who married Rosa Maria Eppens at Retiro in 1914: that act calls its groom SOLTERO at thirty, and Mendoza is a long way from Buenos Aires. The distinction was made on the Eppens row - "two men, one name" - but the relationship file went on attaching Adela and Avelino to the wrong man until the two rows were merged on 20 September and the disagreement became visible. NOTHING IS KNOWN OF HIM BEYOND THE ACT - not a birth, not a marriage, not a place of origin. HE IS ORIENTAL - URUGUAYAN - AND THAT ANSWERS ONE OF THE FOUR OPEN QUESTIONS ON /open-questions/, 9 October 2026. The baptism of his daughter MARIA ADELA at the Iglesia Matriz de Mendoza on 6 January 1900 calls the parents 'orientales, domiciliados en este Curato'. data/cajon-985-origins.tsv had his origin as 'Not established'. SO FOUR OF THE CAJON 985 FATHERS ARE NOW TRACEABLE AND EVERY ONE IS URUGUAYAN OR MARRIED IN URUGUAY, which is a base rate that bears on Juan Carlos Lerena without naming him. AND AN AVELINO LERENA STOOD GODFATHER TO HIS DAUGHTER, BY PROXY: 'padrinos Domingo Simois por ABELINO LERENA'. This register holds FOUR men of that name and the act gives him no age, no patronymic and no residence - SO HE IS NOT PLACED IN ANY BRANCH, AND THE REASON IS ON THE RECORD: the Arturo Lerena row of that same file was once written as a son of Avelino Lerena and Ambrosia Traibel and withdrawn the same day as a conflation. THE NAME OF HIS WIFE IS ALSO WRONG IN THIS ROW'S TITLE: the act and the army index both write CARNIGLIA, with an r. AND THE CITY, AN HOUR AFTER THE COUNTRY. His second daughter's baptism of 23 April 1902 is on a PRINTED FORM - 'Partidas de Bautismos de la Parroquia Matriz de Mendoza' - with a 'natural de' blank for each parent, and it reads 'Hija legitima de D. CARLOS LERENA, natural de MONTEVIDEO'. THE 1900 ACT COULD ONLY SAY 'ORIENTALES' BECAUSE IT WAS PROSE; THE 1902 FORM ASKS THE QUESTION. SO HE IS A MONTEVIDEAN IN MENDOZA, and the fourth traceable father of Cajon 985 - none of whom is Argentine. AND A SECOND LERENA STOOD GODPARENT TO A CHILD OF HIS, AGAIN BY PROXY: MERCEDES LERENA DE MARTINEZ, represented by the child's own mother. TWO LERENA GODPARENTS, NEITHER PRESENT - which is what relatives in another country do.