Carlos A. LERENA (plaintiff, Buenos Aires 1890)
THE CASE IS NAMED FOR HIM - 'Escalada, Carlos M.; LERENA, CARLOS A.' - so he is a party, not a passer-by. He sued the testamentary estate of DON CARLOS MARIA ESCALADA for money: 'contestando a la demanda entablada por D. CARLOS A. LERENA, SOBRE COBRO DE PESOS'. What he was claiming was 'LA COMISION POR LA COMPRAVENTA a que se refiere', so he was acting as a BROKER ON A SALE and wanted his commission out of a dead man's estate. THE ESTATE'S ANSWER IS A FLAT REFUSAL - the lawyer A. FERREYRA asks the judge to dismiss it with costs, because the claim rests on 'su sola afirmacion', he 'no acompana documento alguno en que conste lo que asevera. NI TAMPOCO PUEDE ACOMPANARLO', the succession having concluded no contract at all. WE DO NOT KNOW WHO WON. 91 images in the file and one read. NOT THE CARLOS LERENA OF MENDOZA who married Adela Camiglia and had Avelino Carlos in 1904 - different city, and a decade too early to be the same working life without evidence; see data/_person-pairs.txt. A LERENA IN BUENOS AIRES COMMERCE IN 1890, which is the decade and the city this archive cares about most, though nothing connects him to Rosario or to Pablo Armando.
No record here names a parent, spouse, child or sibling for this person. This archive calls that unplaced: held, named, shown with the record that produced them, and not tied to a household on anything less.
What the record says
Where this comes from
Escalada, Carlos M.; Lerena, Carlos A.: Buenos Aires City - PROBATE ESTATE CASE FILES 1891, item 11 of 91 images, the answer filed February 1890 - FULL-TEXT TRANSCRIPT READ 11 OCTOBER 2026; image ark 3:1:3QHV-V3DS-X934-6
family papers — held offline, not on a public site
No relationships are recorded for this person. The source names them and nothing more. That is the ordinary case in this register, and it is why they are marked unplaced.
What is known
THE CASE IS NAMED FOR HIM - 'Escalada, Carlos M.; LERENA, CARLOS A.' - so he is a party, not a passer-by. He sued the testamentary estate of DON CARLOS MARIA ESCALADA for money: 'contestando a la demanda entablada por D. CARLOS A. LERENA, SOBRE COBRO DE PESOS'. What he was claiming was 'LA COMISION POR LA COMPRAVENTA a que se refiere', so he was acting as a BROKER ON A SALE and wanted his commission out of a dead man's estate. THE ESTATE'S ANSWER IS A FLAT REFUSAL - the lawyer A. FERREYRA asks the judge to dismiss it with costs, because the claim rests on 'su sola afirmacion', he 'no acompana documento alguno en que conste lo que asevera. NI TAMPOCO PUEDE ACOMPANARLO', the succession having concluded no contract at all. WE DO NOT KNOW WHO WON. 91 images in the file and one read. NOT THE CARLOS LERENA OF MENDOZA who married Adela Camiglia and had Avelino Carlos in 1904 - different city, and a decade too early to be the same working life without evidence; see data/_person-pairs.txt. A LERENA IN BUENOS AIRES COMMERCE IN 1890, which is the decade and the city this archive cares about most, though nothing connects him to Rosario or to Pablo Armando.
Where they were found
Others recorded in the same place: Gilberto LERENA (Gilberto Justiniano LERENA LENGUAS) · Maria E. C. LERENA · Maria Luisa LERENA · Raul LERENA · Maria E. LERENA · Josefa LERENA de L. · Leandro LERENA · Emilia LERENA · Francisco LERENA (b.1890, 1895 census) · Paulina LERENA · Avelina LERENA · Gilberto LERENA Salvanach (the younger, b.1878)
This page is generated from data/lerena-register.tsv and data/relations.tsv, so it cannot fall out of step with the register or the chart. All 685 entries → · ← All the people